A product management case study on leading cross-platform development through 20+ user interviews and 4 design iterations—transforming a web-only password manager into an integrated in-app experience that achieved hockey-stick growth and industry recognition.
At PureSquare (a cybersecurity company with millions of active VPN users), our password manager was opening in a web view, causing security issues and friction in the user's journey. User feedback consistently highlighted critical problems: the web view created security vulnerabilities and users had to deal with additional loading times and context switching every time they needed to manage passwords.
This web view implementation not only compromised security but also created unnecessary complexity that significantly reduced password manager adoption. Users told us they wanted password management capabilities directly integrated into the app they used daily—not through a separate web view.
Defining Success: Working with business stakeholders and analyzing user feedback patterns, we defined our north star metric clearly: Activation = Adding 1st Vault Item. This meant the moment a user successfully saved their first password, credit card, or secure note to the password manager—a clear signal of product adoption and value realization.
The Core Product Challenge: How do you design and launch an in-app password manager across 4 different platforms (Android, iOS, macOS, Windows) that feels native to each OS, reduces user friction, and drives meaningful adoption—without overwhelming users with feature bloat or creating platform fragmentation?
I led the end-to-end product development from initial discovery through post-launch optimization:
B2C Focus First: We deliberately paused B2B features (organization management, team password sharing) to focus exclusively on consumer use cases. This decision allowed us to:
Platform-Specific Complexity: Each operating system presented unique technical constraints—iOS autofill APIs work differently than Android accessibility services work differently than desktop browser extensions. This meant "one design fits all" wouldn't work; we needed platform-specific thinking from day one.
I structured this 5-month product development journey around three interconnected principles:
1. Let users guide design through iterative testing (20+ interviews across 4 rounds)
2. Ship incrementally with phased rollouts (March → April → June launches)
3. Measure activation at every stage to inform next-phase priorities
Before writing a single line of code or finalizing any design mockups, I invested 6 weeks in comprehensive user research to derisk our assumptions and identify hidden friction points.
Started with cross-functional team interviews (engineering, design, customer support, QA) to surface technical constraints, historical context, and institutional knowledge. Engineering highlighted Android accessibility permission challenges; support knew users frequently forgot master passwords; design understood iOS review guideline constraints.
Recruited active VPN users from our global user base and conducted 20+ remote user interviews structured across 4 distinct rounds. Each round tested different password manager flow variations (5 users per round), with learnings from one round directly informing the next iteration's design changes.
By Round 4 (the final validation round), users completed all test tasks—"Generate strong password," "Update existing password," "Delete password," "Autofill on Facebook"—without any blockers or confusion. This zero-blocker milestone gave us confidence to greenlight engineering work.
After incorporating feedback from all 4 research rounds, we finalized the UI/UX design specifications that would create a smooth, efficient in-app password manager experience. Design included platform-specific adaptations (iOS native components, Material Design for Android, etc.).
The transformation from Round 1 (multiple blockers) to Round 4 (zero blockers) demonstrates the power of systematic, user-driven iteration. Here's what we learned and fixed:
Specific blockers we eliminated between rounds:
Key Research Insight: Users didn't want feature parity with standalone password managers like 1Password or LastPass—they wanted the essentials done extremely well. Our research validated that focusing on "MUST HAVE" features (create, edit, delete, sync, password generator) that fit mobile-first workflows was more valuable than cramming in every possible advanced capability. Simplicity won.
Armed with user research insights, I made critical scoping decisions to maximize speed-to-market while ensuring a complete-feeling user experience. The key question: "What can users not accomplish their core password management tasks without?"
Phase 1 MUST HAVEs (Shipped March 2025):
Phase 2 NICE TO HAVEs (Shipped April-June 2025):
The Strategic Payoff: By ruthlessly prioritizing Phase 1 features, we shipped a complete-feeling product in March rather than waiting until June for "everything." Users got immediate value; we got immediate feedback to validate our approach before committing significant engineering resources to Phase 2 development.
Rather than attempting a simultaneous 4-platform launch (high risk of fragmentation and platform-specific bugs derailing everything), I designed a sequential rollout strategy that maximized learning while minimizing risk.
Here's the detailed activation trajectory that tells the story of how systematic product development drives compounding growth:
The 52% month-over-month spike in June wasn't a single-variable outcome—it resulted from multiple strategic factors aligning simultaneously:
User-Driven Iteration: We tested 4 design variations with 20+ users until blockers disappeared. Round 1 had multiple issues; Round 4 had zero. Investing 6 weeks in research upfront saved months of post-launch fixes.
This 5-month project reinforced that great product management is about coordinating across time (phased rollout), teams (cross-functional alignment across design, 4 platform engineering teams, QA, support, marketing), and platforms (4 different OS constraints and user expectations)—while keeping user needs as the unwavering north star. Research, prioritization, and execution discipline matter equally. You can't skip research and hope to nail the product (Round 1 blockers proved this). You can't build everything and ship slowly (B2C-first scoping proved faster shipping wins). You can't ignore marketing and expect organic discovery (June's marketing amplification proved this). All three pillars—research, scoping, marketing—must work together to drive breakthrough results.
Check out my other case studies or explore my approach to product management.